<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aspire &#187; sunk costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/tag/sunk-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspirekc.com</link>
	<description>Bigger, Better, Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Have you ever been sunk by sunk costs?</title>
		<link>http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2009/06/11/have-you-ever-been-sunk-by-sunk-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2009/06/11/have-you-ever-been-sunk-by-sunk-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Kinkade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunk costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2009/06/11/have-you-ever-been-sunk-by-sunk-costs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.aspirekc.com/images/sub.jpg"></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been fascinated by the concept of Sunk Costs &#8211; it&#8217;s one of those discussions that intellectually most people understand &#8211; as long as it applies to someone else!&#160; However when it comes to your situation, things aren&#8217;t always so clear.</p>
<p>Just so we&#8217;re on the same page, sunk costs are essentially old investments <p><a href=http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2009/06/11/have-you-ever-been-sunk-by-sunk-costs/ rel="bookmark" title="Read Have you ever been sunk by sunk costs?">Read More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.aspirekc.com/images/sub.jpg"></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been fascinated by the concept of Sunk Costs &#8211; it&#8217;s one of those discussions that intellectually most people understand &#8211; as long as it applies to someone else!&nbsp; However when it comes to your situation, things aren&#8217;t always so clear.</p>
<p>Just so we&#8217;re on the same page, sunk costs are essentially old investments (time or money) that are now irrecoverable.&nbsp; Logically they should have no bearing on any decisions going forward (they&#8217;re sunk costs that you can&#8217;t get back) however there is a very real psychological component that tends to impact decisions.</p>
<p>How often have you heard someone say something like:&nbsp; &#8220;I can&#8217;t let Susie go, I&#8217;ve invested all of that time and money into training her&#8221;.&nbsp;&nbsp; It&#8217;s not a rational statement, the only thing that matters is whether or not the business owner believes Susie is going to deliver more value than her future salary.&nbsp; If the answer is no, then she should &#8216;let her light shine brighter elsewhere!&#8217; as one of my old bosses used to say.</p>
<p>How do you catch yourself from getting caught up in the Sunk Cost trap?</p>
<p><span id="more-274"></span><br />
<h3><strong>Studies on the Sunk Cost Effect</strong></h3>
<p>A friend of mine &#8211; Wade Carpenter is the owner of <a href="http://summitwealthadvisors.com/home.aspx" target="_blank">Summit Wealth Advisors</a> and he sends out a great weekly newsletter (you should ask to get on his mailing list).&nbsp; Part of last week&#8217;s topic was on sunk costs &#8211; including an interesting reference to a Princeton study:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Sunk costs and mental accounting can be hazardous to your wealth. </b>Let’s pretend that you just arrived at a theater and as you reach into your pocket to pull out the $10 ticket that you purchased in advance, you discover that it’s missing. Would you fork over another $10 to see the movie? Compare that to a second scenario in which you did not buy the ticket in advance, but when you arrive at the theater, you discover you lost a $10 bill. Would you still buy a movie ticket?<b></b>
<p>In these two scenarios, you effectively lost $10, but here’s where it gets interesting. Psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman of Princeton University conducted the above study in 1984. They discovered that only 46% of the study participants in scenario one said they would spend another $10 to buy another movie ticket. However, a whopping 88% of the subjects in scenario two said they would still spend $10 to buy a theater ticket. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to the researchers, the reason for the huge discrepancy in behavior is that the participants in scenario 1 that lost the ticket mentally translated the cost of the movie as a $20 ticket which was not worth it to over half of them.</p>
<p>Wade&#8217;s newsletter was making this point because this type of thinking really comes into play when people evaluate stock performance.&nbsp; I know I&#8217;ve been guilty of thinking &#8220;I&#8217;ll just hold onto this stock until it comes back to break even&#8221;&nbsp; (as it turns out break even might never come&#8230;it can be an expensive way to look at things).</p>
<p>The other rational given by psychologists for Sunk Cost behavior is that people don&#8217;t like to admit mistakes.&nbsp; People hate they idea that they &#8216;wasted&#8217; time and money.&nbsp; It&#8217;s not any more rational, but it does show up a lot.</p>
<h3><strong>What do you do about Sunk Costs?</strong></h3>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s at risk for getting pulled into a sunk cost trap, so what can you do to avoid it?</p>
<p><strong>Do the math.</strong>&nbsp; When it comes to financial impacts, you have to get into a habit of working the numbers based on <strong>where you are now</strong>.&nbsp; Admit your mistakes, cut your losses, don&#8217;t throw good money after bad &#8211; all of those ideas apply and they&#8217;re a little more black and white when it comes to straight financial decisions.</p>
<p><strong>Be mindful of why you&#8217;re choosing (or not choosing) to do something</strong>.&nbsp; If it&#8217;s because you hate the idea of all the time and money you wasted on something.&nbsp; If it&#8217;s because you&#8217;re hoping for a miracle turnaround so you don&#8217;t look like you failed, then you need to realize that you&#8217;re not making a rational decision.&nbsp; It might be a blow to your ego, but admitting mistakes and moving on is how successful people get ahead.</p>
<p><strong>Start at ground zero</strong>.&nbsp; Approach difficult decisions as if you were just hired and handed a difficult situation to resolve.&nbsp; You don&#8217;t care how you got here, you just want to make the best decision going forward.</p>
<p>What sunk cost traps have you run into?&nbsp; How do you handle them?&nbsp; Share your thoughts below.</p>
<p>Shawn Kinkade&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.aspirekc.com/" target="_blank">Kansas City Business Coach</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2011/09/12/confronting-the-brutal-facts-employees/" rel="bookmark" title="September 12, 2011">Confronting the Brutal Facts &#8211; Employees</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2010/01/24/have-you-gotten-into-the-shark-tank-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="January 24, 2010">Have you gotten into the Shark Tank yet?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2009/08/06/are-you-looking-for-money-in-your-business/" rel="bookmark" title="August 6, 2009">Are you looking for money in your business?</a></li>
</ul>
<!-- Similar Posts took 11.054 ms -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aspirekc.com/Blog/2009/06/11/have-you-ever-been-sunk-by-sunk-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

